★★★★ 29 minutes Lundstrom quotes Captain Duckworth as saying that the essential tactical lessons for using multiple carriers had been demonstrated in 1942 and that “all we did was apply them in the summer & fall of 1943.” [55] But two other oftenunmentioned developments were essential if multicarrier U.S. task forces were to raid far... Continua a leggere →
Replacing Battleships with Aircraft Carriers in the Pacific in World War II (I)
★★★★ This is a case study of operational and tactical innovation in the U.S. Navy during World War II. Its purpose is to erase a myth—the myth that Navy tactical and operational doctrine existing at the time of Pearl Harbor facilitated a straightforward substitution of carriers for the battleship force that had been severely damaged... Continua a leggere →
Military History and Military Theory
★★★ Introduction War is a human phenomena that occurs everywhere and has done so throughout the ages. This has given rise to both military history and military theory as fields of study. The relationship between them is not a simple one. At the heart of the problem lies the way in which historical experience can... Continua a leggere →
Shooting from tanks from closed firing positions, pros and cons
★★ It is know that everything new is well forgotten old. This expression reflects the essence of the historical research method widely used in science. The study of any object and phenomenon from the point of view of the dialectic of its development from the moment of its appearance to the current state, the analysis... Continua a leggere →
Strategia, arte operativa e tattica
★★ In guerra, una comunità politica si sforza di imporre la propria volontà su un'altra, impiegando la forza militare. Ciò comporta generalmente l'inflizione, o la minaccia di inflizione, di un danno sostanziale ai membri della comunità nemica e alle loro proprietà. Naturalmente, l'altra parte non si sottometterà docilmente a questo: se lo farà, non ci... Continua a leggere →
Is it Useful for Military Officers to Study Military History?
★★ German historian Hans Delbruck, often regarded as the first modern military historian, believed the danger with military professionals studying military history was the fear that they transfer ‘phenomena from contemporary practice to the past without taking adequate account of the differences in circumstances’ (quoted in Howard, 1981, p.11). Indeed, Professor Michael Howard[1] (1981) contends... Continua a leggere →
